Nana Akomea Explains Why NPP Rejected Kufuor’s Petition to Postpone National Conference
NPP stalwart Nana Akomea has broken his silence on why the New Patriotic Party rejected former President John Kufuor’s call to postpone its national conference, citing constitutional timelines and electoral urgency.

Nana Akomea Explains Why NPP Rejected Kufuor’s Petition to Postpone National Conference
The New Patriotic Party (NPP) has come under scrutiny following its decision to go ahead with its national conference despite a petition from former President John Agyekum Kufuor calling for a postponement. Breaking the party's silence, leading NPP figure Nana Akomea has provided clarity on why the party turned down the elder statesman's request.
Speaking during an interview on a current affairs program, Nana Akomea explained that the party’s leadership had deep respect for President Kufuor’s concerns but ultimately prioritized constitutional timelines, electoral obligations, and internal readiness for the 2024 general elections.
“We deeply respect former President Kufuor and value his wisdom, but the party must operate within its constitutional framework. Postponing the conference would have created serious complications,” Akomea said.
The Petition and Its Context
Former President Kufuor had reportedly written to the party’s National Council, requesting a delay in the conference. His petition raised concerns over unresolved internal disputes, lack of adequate stakeholder consultation, and what he described as “a climate of tension” within the party's grassroots.
He argued that proceeding with the conference under such conditions would risk division rather than unity.
However, Nana Akomea clarified that the conference was not just a ceremonial gathering but a crucial constitutional requirement meant to ratify decisions, elect national executives, and formally chart the party’s path toward the 2024 elections.
“Any delay would have put us in breach of the party’s own constitution, and that would set a dangerous precedent,” he added.
Unity vs. Urgency
Akomea acknowledged that while there were internal tensions, they were not unusual in a large political organization. He emphasized that the national conference was an opportunity to iron out differences through dialogue and collective decision-making — not a threat to party unity.
“Postponing unity does not guarantee it. Sometimes, coming together and debating issues in the open is how we build stronger cohesion.”
He also dismissed claims that the party leadership was ignoring elder statesmen, stating that Kufuor’s concerns were discussed extensively before the final decision was taken.
Mixed Reactions from Party Members
The NPP’s decision to reject the petition has drawn mixed reactions. Some grassroots members believe the party should have heeded Kufuor’s call for restraint and reflection.
However, others have commended the leadership for sticking to its roadmap and showing decisiveness ahead of a crucial election year.
Political analyst Dr. Evans Mensah noted:
“This decision shows a maturing political organization — willing to listen to advice but still make firm choices. However, how the leadership handles post-conference reconciliation will be critical.”
Conclusion
While the NPP moves forward with its national conference amid mixed internal sentiments, Nana Akomea’s explanation underscores the balancing act between respecting legacy voices like President Kufuor and fulfilling immediate organizational duties. All eyes are now on the party’s ability to emerge united and energized for the 2024 electoral challenge.
What's Your Reaction?






